Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR BEFORE SHRI SANJAY ARORA, HON‟BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2019 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Pankaj Goel, Seventh Lane, vs. Asst. CIT, Circle Itarsi, Itarsi (MP) Itarsi. [PAN : AHEPG 5844 K] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Sapan Usrethe, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr. DR CORRIGENDUM Per Sanjay Arora, AM Order under section 254(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟) in the captioned appeal was passed on 29/09/2022. It is, however, found that there have occurred certain omissions in the said order, which are, therefore, hereby sought to be rectified through this corrigendum order. The same being only correction of those errors, do not therefore per se cause any prejudice to either party. The details are as under:
Para 2.3 (pages 4-6 of the order) The following words be read in the fourth sentence of the said para, beginning with the words „That the house property is…..‟ (at page 4 of the order), after the words „in which case the rent from building‟: “would be assessable as „income from house property‟,” and the last words of the sentence „business income‟ be placed under parenthesis.
Para 2.4 (pages 6-7 of the order) 1 | P a g e
ITA No. 75/JAB/2019 (AY: 2013-14) Pankaj Goel v. Asst. CIT In the sentence beginning with the words „In the facts of the case, …‟, at page 6 of the order , the word „of‟ be read between the words „one‟ and „whose objects‟.
Sd/- Sd/- (Manomohan Das) (Sanjay Arora) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 14/11/2022 vr/- Copy to: 1. The Appellant: Pankaj Goel, Seventh Lane, Itarsi (MP) 2. The Respondent: Asst. CIT, Circle Itarsi (MP) 3. The Principal CIT-1, Bhopal 4. The CIT(Appeals)-1, Bhopal 5. The Sr. D.R., ITAT, Jabalpur. 6. Guard File. By order
(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Jabalpur.
2 | P a g e