SHRI SACHANAND TIRTHANI,JABALPUR vs. PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 27/JAB/2019Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 February 2022AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal as it had become infructuous due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. The assessee later opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed before the ITAT is maintainable when the assessee has opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, rendering the appeal infructuous.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR

Before: SHRI SANJAY ARORA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTNT MEMBER & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, HONBLE

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, CA
For Respondent: Shri Debashish Lahiri, CIT-DR
Hearing: 16/02/2022Pronounced: 11/03/2022

O R D E R Per Bench: This is an Appeal by the Assessee agitating the Order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 27/02/2019 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Jabalpur (‘Pr.CIT’, for short) in respect of the assessee’s assessment u/s. 143(3), dated 05/08/2016, for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15.

2.

At the outset, Shri Dhiraj Ghai, ld.counsel for the Assessee, would submit that the Assessee seeks permission for withdrawal of the instant appeal, in view of he having opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020 (VSVS), enclosing alongwith Form 5 dated 28/01/2022.

3.

A perusal of the record shows that the assessment pursuant to the impugned order was made on 25/11/2019, which stands appealed against by the (A.Y. 2014-15) Sachanand Tirthani v. Pr. CIT assessee before the first appellate authority on 11/01/2020. It is this appeal which was outstanding for adjudication at the time of the assessee applying under VSVS in Form 1 (copy on record). The matter has attained finality with the acceptance of the assessee’s application and the consequent issue of Form 5 under Rule 7 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Rules, 2020 on 28/01/2022. The assessee’s appeal against revision order becomes, under the circumstances, infructuous. We, therefore, have no hesitation in accepting the assessee’s request, to which no objection was also raised by the ld. CIT-DR during hearing, dismissing his appeal as infructuous. The same in fact becomes non-maintainable in view of the provisions of Direct Tax VSV Act, 2020. We decide accordingly.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as infructuous.

Order Pronounced in open Court on this 11th day of March, 2022.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →