BAJAJSONS LTD.,C-103 vs. DCIT-CC- III, LUDHIANA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance was unjustified as the non-furnishing of Form 10DA was due to technical reasons beyond the assessee's control and the defect was subsequently cured. The assessee's explanation for the delay was accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80JJA but it was disallowed for late filing of Form 10DA. The assessee argued that the revised form was notified after the due date for filing the return and technical glitches prevented timely uploading.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of deduction under Section 80JJA is justified solely on the ground of late filing of Form 10DA due to technical reasons and delayed notification of the revised form.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 09.07.2021 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’]
The assessee in this appeal has taken following grounds of appeal:- -Chd-2021 M/s Bajaj Sons Ltd, Ludhiana 2
1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts of the case in upholding disallowance of deduction claimed amounting to Rs. 529575/- u/s 80JJA on account of late filing of Form 10DA without appreciating that revised Form 10DA was notified and made available on e-filing portal of Income Tax Department after due date for filing income tax return.
2. The appellant craves leave to alter, amend or delete the aforesaid ground of appeal or to take any other ground at the time of hearing and till the time the appeal is finally disposed off.
3. The sole issue raised by the assessee relates to the disallowance of deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 80JJA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') on the ground that the assessee had late filed Form No. 10DA.
4. At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the impugned order of the Assessing officer as well as impugned order of the CIT(A) to submit that the claim of deduction u/s 80JJA has been denied to the assessee due to not furnishing the required report in Form No. 10DA along with return of income. He, in this respect has submitted that, in fact, there was an amendment in the Income Tax Act and the Department amended the contents of Form 10DA which was not notified at the date of filing of the return of income on 19.10.2019. That the said Form 10DA was notified on 18.12.2019, but even the online uploading was not possible at that time -Chd-2021 M/s Bajaj Sons Ltd, Ludhiana 3 due to the technical glitches. The Form 10DA was uploaded by the assessee on 20.7.2020. That the non-filing of the Form No.10DA along with return of income was beyond the control of the assessee.
The Ld. DR, on the other hand, has submitted that the assessee, under the circumstances, could have uploaded the unrevised / old form 10DA along with return of income.
In rebuttal, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the said old form was not applicable to the case of the assessee as certain information as per revised form was to be furnished and the same could not be furnished due to the non-availability of new notified form 10DA. Even the assessee was under bonafide belief that only new /amended form has to be uploaded.
We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record.
In this case, the disallowance of deduction has been made because of the technical reason of non-furnishing of Form 10DA along with return of income. The assessee has duly explained that it was not due to any fault on the part of the assessee, rather, the same was due to technical glitches and non-availability of the revised Form 10DA by the Income Tax Department as the same was notified after the date of filing of return by the assessee. However, the assessee subsequently uploaded Form 10DA when it became available and cured the defect. In view of -Chd-2021 M/s Bajaj Sons Ltd, Ludhiana 4 the aforesaid explanation, in our view, the action of the lower authorities in denying deduction to the assessee on the technical reason, compliance of which was not possible at the time of filing of the return, as explained above, cannot be held to be justified.
In view of this, the impugned order of the CIT(A) is set aside and it is directed to allow the claim of deduction u/s 10 JJA to the assessee.
The appeal of the assessee stands allowed. Order pronounced on 26.11.2021.
More judgments on Section 80JJA
- Expert Global Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1…ITA 2557/PUN/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed10 Apr 2026AY 2022-2023
- Expert Global Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1…ITA 2556/PUN/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed10 Apr 2026AY 2021-2022
- Gardex India Private Limited, Jalandhar vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1…ITA 377/ASR/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed21 Jan 2026AY 2023-24
- Arutla Charan Reddy, Hyderabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(1), HyderabadITA 1347/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed21 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
- Klin Industries, Sandha Khamidana, Junagadh vs The ACIT, Circle, JunagadhITA 857/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: Heard15 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunita Bhagat Proprietor Of Krishab Impex vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Arun Aloysius Barnes vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 14 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026