Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
O R D E R आदेश आदेश आदेश PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT : The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central), Ahmedabad dated 29th March 2019 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short) for Assessment Year 2014-15.
The learned Counsel for the assessee, at the very outset, submitted that in pursuance of impugned order of PCIT dated 29th March 2019, the Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order. He made partial additions. Those additions were challenged before the learned CIT(A) who has deleted the additions. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed for want of tax effect. Hence, the assessee got the relief; therefore, it is not interested in prosecuting this appeal and prayed for dismissal of this appeal as withdrawn. We do not have any hesitation in dismissing the appeal of M/s. Siddheshwari Infrastructure Vs. PCIT AY : 2014-15 2 the assessee as withdrawn on the strength of the statement made by Shri Biren Shah, learned Counsel for the assessee before us. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 17th November 2021 at Ahmedabad.