SHRI VITTHALBHAI M. PATEL,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE, GANDHINAGAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the scheme benefit was not availed for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty order. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 scheme. Consequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 06.10.2016 arising in the penalty order dated 28.09.2015 passed by the DCIT, Gandhinagar Circle, Gandhinagar under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2012-13.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has filed declaration and undertaking in Form No. 1 as per provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for availment of the benefit under the scheme. In view of this, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that assessee does not want to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise A.Y. 2012-13 - 2 - of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and sought permission for withdrawal of appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel has placed on record copy of Form No. 1 and 2.
The Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeals in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written requests made on behalf of the captioned party, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced on 17/11/2021
Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (MADHUMITA ROY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 17/11/2021 TRUE COPY TANMAY आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद । 1.Da te o f d ic ta t io n o n 0 3.1 1.20 21 As pe r V SV A Fo r mat 2.Da te o n w hic h t he t yped d ra ft is p lace d be fo r e t he D ic tat in g M e mb er 03. 11. 20 21 3.Da te o n w hic h t he a pp r o ve d d r a ft co mes to t he S r.P. S. /P. S. . 11.2 02 1 4.Da te o n w hic h t he fa ir o rde r is p lac ed be fo re t he D ic ta t ing M e mb er fo r pr o no unce me nt .11. 20 21 5.Da te o n w hic h t he fa ir o rde r c o mes bac k t o t he Sr. P. S./ P. S 17 .1 1.20 21 6.Da te o n w hic h t he fi le goes to t he Be nc h C le rk 17 .1 1. 20 21 7.Da te o n w hic h t he fi le goes to t he Hea d C le r k… … ……. 8.The dat e o n w hic h t he fi le goe s to t he Asst t. Re gis tr ar fo r s ig nat ur e o n t he or de r… … …… … …… … 9.Da te o f D espa tc h o f t he O r de r …… …
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026