SHRI ADITYA RAJ,CHHINDWARA vs. PR. CIT -1, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Since the subsequent order resolved the issue, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal as a subsequent order had been passed accepting the returned income, removing the grievance.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee against the Section 263 order should be dismissed as withdrawn due to subsequent developments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI SANJAY ARORA, HON’BLE & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, HONBLE
Per Sanjay Arora, AM
This is an appeal by the assessee directed against the order u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’, hereinafter) in the assessee’s case for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2015-16, dated 25/03/2021.
At the very outset it was observed by the Bench that the assessee has, through his counsel, made a written request for permission to withdraw the appeal. The order pursuant to the sec. 263 order, it is stated, has since been passed, accepting the returned income, so that no cause of grievance survives. The ld. CIT- DR fairly did not object to the same.
(A.Y. 2015-16) Aditya Raj vs. Pr.CIT
Under the circumstances, we have no hesitation in, accepting the assessee’s application dated 06/05/2022 (copy on record), dismiss its’ appeal in limine. We decide accordingly.
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open Court on May 12, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026