No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
O R D E R
PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT :
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad dated 28.02.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2015-16.
At the time of hearing before us, none appeared on behalf the assessee. However, vide application dated 06.04.2021, the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020” and also submitted that the assessee has already received Form No.5, being the order for full and final settlement of tax arrears under the said Scheme, issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad-3 in this regard, which is placed on record.
The learned Departmental Representative submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
Mahalaxmi Industries Vs. DCIT AY : 2015-16 2
We have considered the submission of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal under the Scheme “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas 2020”. In the light of aforesaid request made by the assessee as also considering the Form No.5 submitted by the assessee towards the final settlement of tax arrears under Section 5(2) read with Section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Form-5) issued by the PCIT, Ahmedabad-3, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fail to avail the benefit of “Vivad se Vishwas Scheme” for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before the ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 21st December 2021 at Ahmedabad.