SANTOSH PANDURANG GAIKWAD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -8 (2), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for disposal on merits. The assessee was to be given an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order passed by the CIT(A). The assessee's counsel submitted that due to pandemic restrictions, they could not make a proper representation before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the CIT(A) and making proper representation due to pandemic restrictions.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-6, Pune on 18-08-2020 in relation to the assessment year 2011-12.
At the very outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that due to prevailing pandemic conditions because of CORONA VIRUS, the assessee could not make out proper representation before the ld. CIT(A) because of movement restrictions and other factors beyond control, which led to the passing of the order during the closure period. It was, therefore, prayed that another opportunity should be granted to the assessee for enabling him to appear before the ld. CIT(A) and make proper representation. No serious exception was taken by the ld. DR. In view of the above stated facts, I set aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for disposing it on merits after giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 29th January, 2021.
Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपा�य� उपा�य�/ VICE PRESIDENT उपा�य� उपा�य� पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 29th January, 2021 Satish
आदेश क� क� क� �ितिलिप क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : अ�ेिषत आदेश आदेश आदेश अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 2. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / 3. The CIT (Appeals)-6, Pune 4. The Pr. CIT-5, Pune िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “SMC” / 5. DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6. // True copy // आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026