KRISHNA BUILDER,JABALPUR vs. PR. CIT-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. The assessment order passed pursuant to the section 263 order had already been made, accepting the assessee's returned income.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order under section 263. The assessee later wished to withdraw the appeal as it did not want to prolong litigation.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal against the revision order is maintainable when the assessee wishes to withdraw it and the subsequent assessment has been finalized.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI SANJAY ARORA, HON’BLE & SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, HONBLE
This is an Appeal by the Assessee agitating the revision of it’s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 08/11/2018 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17, vide order u/s. 263, dated 27/03/2021.
At the very outset, it was submitted by Shri Gupta, the ld. counsel for the assessee, with reference to assessee’s application dated 24/06/2022, that the assessee wishes to withdraw it’s instant appeal as it did not want to enlarge litigation. Permission for the same was accordingly prayed for, to which Shri Kumar, the ld. Sr. DR, did not fairly object.
(A.Y. 2016-17) Krishna Builder v. Pr. CIT
We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. Assessment pursuant to s.263 order has since been made on 31/03/2022, accepting the assessee’s returned (on 30/03/2017) income of Rs. 12,44,120, i.e., as originally assessed u/s. 143(3) on 18/11/2018. Under the circumstances, the instant appeal is rendered academic. We, accordingly, have no hesitation in accepting the assessee’s prayer and, accordingly, permit the withdrawal of it’s instant appeal. We decide accordingly.
In the result, the assessee’s captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open Court on June 29, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026