RAJENDER KUMAR JAIN HUF,DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-34(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention that the quantum dispute was settled under the VSVS Act, 2020. Consequently, the appeal was restored to the AO for decision as per the relevant provisions of the VSVS Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order for AY 2015-16. The assessee contended that the quantum of tax dispute had been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS Act, 2020).
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) survives when the underlying tax dispute has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA & SH. N. K. CHOUDHRY
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-12, New Delhi dated 19.06.2019 pertaining to A.Y.2015-16. 2. At the very, outset the authorized representative drew our attention to form No.5 being order for full and final settlement of tax arrear under direct tax VSV Act, 2020 and pointed out that the quarrel relating to the quantum has been settled under VSVS Act, 2020, therefore, the consequent levy of penalty u/s. 271 (1) (c) of the Act does not survive as per relevant provisions of the VSVS Act, 2020.
We have carefully perused the documents filed before us. We find force in the contention of the Counsel the tax relating to the quantum dispute have been settled as per the tax challan submitted before us. We, therefore, deem it fit to restore the issues in the appeal to the files of the AO. The AO is directed to decide the issues as per relevant provision of the VSVS Act, 2020 as the quarrel relating to the quantum have been settled.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order announced in the open court on 23.01.2023.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026