DRA BLA BCL JV,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-15, DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2499/DEL/2022Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 January 2023AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that it was unclear if notices were properly served and the CIT(Appeals) did not decide on merits. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The matter was sent back to the CIT(Appeals) for a fresh decision after providing adequate opportunity.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(Appeals) was dismissed ex-parte without proper opportunity. The assessee requested the matter be restored to the CIT(Appeals) for a fresh decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Appeals) order was passed without providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.” : DELHI ]

Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD,

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Kumar Jha, Ms. Indu Bala Saini
Hearing: 31/01/2023

आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26 [hereinafter referred 1 to CIT (Appeals)] New Delhi, dated 27.07.2022 for assessment year 2017-18.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that the ld. CIT (Appeals) passed ex-parte order dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that as the appeal of the assessee has been dismissed without giving proper opportunity, the same be restored to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals).

3.

The ld. DR has no serious objection in sending the matter back to the ld. CIT (Appeals).

4.

Heard rival submissions perused the orders of the authorities below. On perusal of the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals) it is noticed that notices were issued to the assessee and there was no response. It is not clear as to whether the notices have been served on the assessee. It is also noticed that the ld. CIT (Appeals) did not pass order on merits. The appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution. The ld. Counsel undertakes to be present before the ld. CIT (Appeals) whenever the appeal is posted for hearing. Taking the totality of facts under consideration, I am of the view that this matter should go back to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals) for deciding afresh in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on : 31/01/2023.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →