VIKAS AGARWAL,BULANDSHAHR vs. PCIT, KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income-Tax Act. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment without making any fresh additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the Section 263 order is maintainable when the subsequent assessment order did not make any additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘H’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This is an appeal by the assessee challenging order dated 07.01.2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central), KNP at Meerut under Section 263 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 pertaining to assessment year 2017-18.
We have heard learned Departmental Representative and perused the material available on record.
The assessee has furnished letter dated nil stating that in pursuance to the order passed under Section 263 of the Act, the Assessing Officer has completed the assessment proceedings vide order dated 28.02.2022 without making any fresh addition. A copy of the assessment order has been attached to this letter.
In view of the fact that in the fresh assessment order the Assessing Officer has not made any addition, the assessee has expressed his willingness to withdraw the present appeal.
Learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
In view of the facts discussed above, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03rd February, 2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026