GREEN CUBE MERCAHNTILE CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. PR . CIT, FARIDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the petition filed by the assessee and allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessee later filed a petition to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assessing Officer had passed a consequential order and no penalty was levied.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn based on subsequent developments in the assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 271E,Section 271D,Section 269SS,Section 269T
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “H” : DELHI ]
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad, dated 16.03.2021 for assessment year 2016-17. 1
In spite of issue of notice none appeared on behalf of assessee when the appeal is listed for hearing today 8.02.2023. However, the counsel for the assessee filed petition on 26.12.2022 requesting for withdrawal of appeal as the Assessing Officer passed consequential order pursuant to order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) by the PCIT wherein the Assessing Officer did not levy penalty under section 271E and 271D of the Act for violation of provisions of section 269SS and 269T in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Adinath Builders (P) Ltd. [108 taxmann.com 57].
The ld. DR has no objection.
After considering the petition filed by the assessee and for the reasons therein the assessee is permitted to withdraw its appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on : 08/02/2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026