ACIT, CIRCLE- 15(1), NEW DELHI vs. LEON REALTORS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT circular mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs should not be filed or pressed. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee pointed out that the tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal by Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals)-5, Delhi dated 22.02.2018 for AY 2014-15.
The Ld. Counsel for Assessee submits that the Revenue effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Referring to the grounds of appeal of the Revenue and the assessment order it is submitted that the disputed addition is only Rs.41,20,845/- on which the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. 1
I.T.A.No. 3266/Del/2018/A.Y.2014-15
We have heard Ld. Representatives of both the parties.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3/18 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT u/s 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. It is also directed that this Instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below this specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. The aforesaid circular has been amended by issuing further Circular No. 17/2019, whereby the monetary limit for filing Income-tax appeals before the Tribunal has been enhanced to Rs. 50 lakhs. Ld. DR in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental appeal. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board Instruction referred to above and, therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.
However, in the event of the Revenue finding that the tax effect in this appeal is more than Rs.50 lakhs or covered under any exceptions under CBDT Circular the Revenue is at liberty to file miscellaneous application for recall of this order.
I.T.A.No. 3266/Del/2018/A.Y.2014-15
In the result, the Departmental appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.02.2023
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026