SNIC COMPANY LTD,JAPAN vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- NOIDA, NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no prejudice would be caused to the Revenue by giving the assessee an opportunity to furnish replies to the notices. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Japanese company, appealed an order passed by the CIT(A) for AY 2011-12. The CIT(A) passed the order without considering additional evidence filed by the assessee. The assessee claimed non-compliance was due to reasons beyond their control and that they have no permanent establishment in India.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an order without considering additional evidence filed by the assessee. Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to comply with notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHIBENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Kul BharatDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-2, Noida dated 06.10.2021 for AY 2011-12.
We find that in the instant case the order has been passed u/s 144/ 147/ 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ld CIT(A) passed the order without considering the additional evidences filed under Rule 46 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. At the outset the ld AR submitted that that the non-compliance to the notices issued is due to reasons beyond the control of the assessee and prayed that given an opportunity due compliance would be made before the Revenue authorities. The assessee submitted that the company is based in Japan and do not have a permanent establishment in India. We find that no prejudice would be caused to Revenue if an opportunity is given to the assessee to furnish replies to the notices issued. Hence, the matter is remanded back to the file of the ld CIT(A) for adjudication afresh. The ld CIT(A) would be at liberty to invoke relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act in case of non-compliance to the notices issued to the assessee .
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 10/03/2023.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026