INDUSLYNK TRAINING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURUGRAM vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), GURGAON
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the grounds for which the appeal was filed had been allowed to the assessee due to the rectification order and the subsequent appeal effect order. Therefore, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee filed a rectification application under section 154, which was allowed, granting the benefit of lower taxation. The Assessing Officer also passed an appeal effect order giving effect to this benefit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee has become infructuous due to subsequent rectification and appeal effect orders.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 15.05.2024 for A.Y 2021-22.
[A.Y 2021-22] Induslynk Training Services 2. At the very outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee filed an application dated 05.08.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the assessee. The relevant portion of the application reasoning the withdrawal reads as under:
“The above-mentioned appeal was filled by assessee on 13 July 2024 bearing for assessment year 2021- 22), against order dated 15 May 2024 passed by Honorable Commissioner of Income- Tax Appeal ['CIT(A)'] under section u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act 1961 ('Act') fixed for hearing before "C" Bench on 07.08.2025. Copy of Acknowledgement of filling of appeal along with Form 36 and Ground of Appeals is attached as Annexure 1.
Your Honour, in this regard, it is relevant to mention that against the above-mentioned order of the CIT(A), assessee has filed rectification application u/s 154 of the Act.
In response to above mentioned rectification application filed by the assessee, National Faceless Appeal Centre ('NFAC') passed order u/s 154 read with section 250 (dated 2 September 2024) rectifying mistakes apparent from record in the order dated 15 May 2024 passed by CIT(A), granting the benefit of lower rate of taxation as per section 115BAA of the Act for AY 2021-22 and directing AO to allow assessee the benefit of lower rate of taxation under section 115BAA of the Act.
[A.Y 2021-22] Induslynk Training Services Consequent to the above stated direction, the Ld.AO has also passed an appeal effect order dated 30 July 2025, allowing assessee benefit of lower rate of taxation under section 115BAA of the Act. Accordingly, the grounds for which the subject appeal is pending has been duly allowed to assessee.
In view of the same, the assessee requests your honours to take the above on record and accept assessee's request to withdraw the subject appeal.”
The ld. DR did not raise any objection.
Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 22.08.2025.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026