PROSPEROUS BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 20(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1918/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 March 2023AY 2007-083 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer had deleted the additions as per the directions of the CIT(A), making the appeal infructuous. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal, and the revenue had no objection.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the Assessing Officer deleted the additions made earlier, rendering the appeal infructuous. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the subsequent deletion of additions by the Assessing Officer, rendering the appeal infructuous.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Shivam Yadav, Advocates

ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-36 [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 25/02/2020 for Assessment Year 2007-08.

Prosperous Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (B) Vide letter dated 21/03/2023, the assessee has sought to withdraw this appeal. Relevant portion of the aforesaid letter dated 21/03/2023 is reproduced as under:

“1) It is humbly submitted that assessment in the case of Assessee for the year under consideration, i.e., AY 2007-08 was completed vide order under Section 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) dated 27.03.2015 at income of Rs.12,49,96,040/- as against the returned income of Rs.14,65,842/- as certain additions were made by the Assessing officer (‘Ld. AO’).

2) Being aggrieved by the order of AO, the Assessee preferred appeal before Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) vide Appeal No. CIT(A), Delhi-36/10187/2016 and subsequently, Ld. CIT(A) passed the order and partly allowed the appeal of the Assessee with certain directions to Ld. AO. In light of above, Assessee preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble ITAT challenging the said order of the Ld. CIT(A) on various legal issues.

3) In the meantime, the Ld. AO as per the directions of Ld. CIT(A), after considering the submissions and evidences filed by the Assessee has deleted the said additions on the merits and passed an assessment order dated 26.03.2021 in the favour of the Assessee.

4) In view of above, it is humbly submitted that the said appeal before the Hon’ble ITAT in the captioned matter is infructuous since the additions are already deleted by the Ld. AO. Therefore, it is humbly prayed that the Assessee wished to withdraw the appeal vide ITA 1918/Del/2020.”

(C) At the time of hearing before us, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee drew our attention to the aforesaid letter dated 21/03/2023 and submitted that the assessee wished to withdraw Prosperous Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO this appeal. The Ld. CIT-DR for Revenue expressed no objection to withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.

(C.1) In view of the foregoing, in the specific facts and circumstances of the present appeal before us, this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

(D) In the result, this appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

This order was pronounced in Open Court on 21/03/23 in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing and is signed today on 21/03/23.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →